Transvaginal Mesh Hemorrhage

One of the complications of implanting surgical mesh vaginally is bleeding. This could result from the procedure itself, the material used, or the inappropriate use of surgical instruments. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) concluded in a July 13, 2011 report that using an abdominal approach to surgery resulted in fewer complications than using a transvaginal approach.

The FDA also reported that transvaginal apical or posterior repair with mesh does not appear to provide any added benefit compared to traditional surgery without mesh.

Complications of Hemorrhage

Blood loss is one of the major complications of hemorrhage. If bleeding does not stop, the surgeon needs to find the source of the bleeding and stop it. Sometimes, blood transfusions are required. Anemia is another complication of hemorrhage.

Safety of Transvaginal Placed Surgical Mesh

Because of concerns among surgeons about the safety of doing a transvaginal procedure using vaginal mesh to repair pelvic organ prolapse (POP), the FDA reviewed the relevant scientific literature published between January 1996 and April 2011.

The FDA listed a number of primary safety concerns with transvaginally placed surgical mesh for POP repair:

  • Patients who have POP mesh repair face mesh-related complications that patients having traditional surgery without mesh do not face.
  • Adverse events associated with transvaginally placed mesh can be life-altering for some women. Complications, such as pain, might continue even with removal of the mesh. Sometimes not all the mesh can be removed.
  • Mesh-associated complications are NOT rare. The most common mesh-related complication experienced by patients undergoing transvaginal POP mesh repair is vaginal mesh erosion. Data from 110 studies that included 11,785 women, showed that about 10 percent of women undergoing the procedure experienced mesh erosion within 12 months of surgery.
  • Mesh contraction, which causes vaginal shortening, tightening and/or vaginal pain in association with transvaginal POP repair with mesh is being increasingly reported in the literature.
  • New onset stress urinary incontinence is reported to occur more often after using mesh for anterior repair compared to traditional anterior repair that doesn't use mesh.
  • Abdominal POP surgery using mesh seems to result in lower rates of mesh complications compared to transvaginal POP surgery with mesh. The median rate of vaginal erosion was four percent within 23 months of surgery.

In addition to reviewing the literature for safety, the FDA also reviewed how effective transvaginal POP repair with mesh compared to traditional non-mesh repair. The agency reported that there is no evidence that using transvaginal mesh is more beneficial than doing surgery without it.

The FDA summarized its key findings by saying, "Based on evaluation of adverse event reports and assessment of the scientific literature, the FDA had NOT seen conclusive evidence that using transvaginally placed mesh in POP repair improves clinical outcomes any more than traditional POP repair that does not use mesh, and it may expose patients to greater risk."

Have You Experienced Hemorrhage?

If you've suffered as a result of complications caused by vaginal mesh, you might qualify for financial compensation. To schedule a free and private initial consultation with an experienced transvaginal mesh hemorrhage lawyer, please contact us today.

Transvaginal Mesh Litigation

Contact Us

Schedule a free and confidential case review today.

* is a required field

Attorney Advertising:
Mass Tort Legal Group
1010 Turquoise Street, Suite 255
San Diego, CA 92109

Top News

Boston Scientific begins to Settle Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits

May 13th, 2015

Roughly 26,000 women have filed transvaginal mesh lawsuits against the medical device manufacturer Boston Scientific. These lawsuits are all based on... read more

Mesh Lawsuit claims Cook Medical "Put its Profits ahead of Patient Safety"

May 1st, 2015

TRANSVAGINALMESHLAWSUITS Mesh Lawsuit claims Cook Medical "Put its Profits ahead of Patient Safety"

A Canadian woman has recently filed a class action... read more

Joint Status Conference for all Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuit MDLs

April 13th, 2015

The federal judge overseeing all transvaginal mesh lawsuits consolidated into multidistrict litigations (MDLs) has recently called another status conference.

At this... read more

Details of the recent $5.7 Million Ethicon Transvaginal Mesh Verdict

March 27th, 2015

Johnson & Johnson is one of multiple medical device manufacturers involved in more than 75,000 transvaginal mesh lawsuits. In these personal... read more

Ethicon Settles Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit

March 16th, 2015

The medical device manufacturer Ethicon was recently ordered by a jury to pay $5.7 million in a transvaginal mesh lawsuit, and... read more

C.R. Bard Settles Bellwether case in Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuit

March 4th, 2015

Medical device manufacturer C.R. Bard recently opted to settle a bellwether lawsuit in the multidistrict litigation (MDL) of transvaginal mesh lawsuits... read more